Sixth Speech- The Speech of Socrates: The Nature and Origin
of Love
The first thing that popped out to me in this section was
when Diotima said, “Do not then insist that what is not fair is of necessity
foul, or what is not good evil; or infer that because love is not fair and good
he is therefore foul and evil; for he is in a mean between them.” (pg 284) I
like this because it connects back to the beginning of the year when we were
talking about arguments and the general opinion of the authors was that we see
issues as black and white, there is no gray area in between but she is saying
that just because something isn’t one thing, it doesn’t necessarily make it the
other thing. There can be something that is a mix of both black and white. Tying
into that, I like that she keeps stressing the fact that there is a mean, or a middle,
in things. She uses the example that love is not divine but is not mortal
either. In general, I like how Diotima describes the birth of love. His mother
Poverty sleeps with a passed out Plenty to create him and I thought it was a
very interesting story. I have a question though, if Poverty is such a pitiful,
stupid woman, then how does she get the idea to sleep with Plenty to make a
baby? I just thought it was clever thinking on the part of Poverty. The last
quote I liked in this section was, “For the beloved is the truly beautiful, and
delicate, and perfect, and blessed; but the principle of love is of another
nature, and is such as I have described.” (pg 286) I like this because in my
mind it just makes sense. To me it says yes, the one you love could be perfect
but loving them could be very painful. Say you absolutely love someone but they
have a drug problem or something. They could be perfect for you but what do you
do about the problem? You love them but can’t be with them… that situation
describes exactly what the quote says to me.
The Cause and Effect of Love
This section is the part where they start off talking
about beautiful women versus good women. Diotima challenges Socrates saying
when you love something beautiful, what does it give you? When he has no
answer, she says ok, let me replace the word with good. Now what do you have? And
he says that you gain happiness by possessing the good. So beauty isn’t always
the same thing as the good; what’s inside doesn’t always match the outside. A quote
I liked was, “Yes, and you hear people say that lovers are seeking for their other
half; but I say that they are seeking neither for the half of themselves, nor
for the whole, unless the half or the whole be also good.” (pg 286) I just
could relate to this because I always think of a mate or whatever as “the other
half” so I thought it was interesting that it mentions that but it ties back
into you are really looking for good on the inside, not necessarily the
outside. I also liked, “…for conception and generation are an immortal
principle in the mortal creature…” (pg 286) I have never thought of it that way
but it’s totally true. Reproducing and passing on your genes is a way to stay
alive forever because there will always be a part of you in someone else. So even
if you are mortal, you can be a part immortal through recreation.
I didn’t find anything very interesting in the last
section of the Symposium but I will say this, after reading it, I felt like if
they were having a debate, which they kind of were, she would have destroyed
him. I don’t see this as a debate though and Socrates says so himself that he
went to Diotima for knowledge. I see this as more of a teacher and pupil type
setting. He knew nothing and she knew it all.
No comments:
Post a Comment